14 March 2012

Directors I Gave Up On: Kevin Smith

There was a time when I actually was a pretty big Kevin Smith fan; and to this day, I still stand by a portion of his work. No matter what he does to further derail his career, for instance, Chasing Amy is still an excellent movie. And for all their faults, I love Clerks II and enjoy the sentiment behind Dogma. So what happened? How did I go from an outspoken fan (I even bought some of the infamous "inaction" figures and a T-shirt) to a soft-spoken critic? Really, not much changed with me - Smith kind of did this to himself.

The problem is Kevin Smith's sensibilities apparently never matured past middle school, and to this day (now in his mid-40s) a vast majority of his humor remains scatological and sexually immature. Much time is devoted to semen and questions of sexual identity. Not to sound as though I'm above a good dirty joke, but after a while it just starts to feel... well, dull.

What happened really is that audiences pigeon-holed him... and then he pigeon-holed himself. With the string of Clerks, Mallrats, Chasing Amy, and Dogma, Kevin Smith established himself as a sharp-tongued, subversive independent - sharing his frank, unromanticized view of the world on a range of topics, not the least of them pop culture and religion. But he always wanted to expand and try something new. Professionally, this included branching into different media altogether (the early 2000s saw a failed animated series, and he has penned and continues to pen a number of comic books), as well as more diverse and mature material. Clerks and Mallrats were about disenfranchised youth, whiling away the hours with inane conversation. Chasing Amy was a departure, and at the same time a return to form. Mallrats - despite its third nipple gag and Porky's-inspired laissez-faire nudity - felt like an attempt to sell out and make it big; Chasing Amy was smaller, quieter, more realistic - a candid look at the vicissitudes of love. Dogma saw a further expansion of his creative talents: with its mix of humor, drama, fantasy, and faith, it is undoubtedly Smith's most ambitious film, and it obviously came from a very personal place. Dogma also marked the first time he ventured out of the "View Askewniverse" - bringing in such heavyweights as Alan Rickman, George Carlin, Linda Fiorentino, Matt Damon, even musician Alanis Morissette and cinematographer Robert Yeoman; while not his best film, it is perhaps his most impressive achievement.

Dogma is also an important demarcation point, in my opinion, because it's after Dogma that we can really see Smith start to struggle with his place in the filmmaking community. It seems he wasn't sure what to do: the kid from New Jersey who had cut his teeth in low-budget fare and had found success with some of the unlikeliest of subject matters, who always had an opinion, suddenly seemed at a loss for words... So he went back to the well and reintroduced the central characters of Clerks, this time in animated form. The show was quickly cancelled (only to find cult success on disc), and he promptly followed it up with the ultimate self-serving/self-abasing tribute: Jay & Silent Bob Strike Back. Now, let me make clear that I still enjoy his output to this point. The Clerks cartoon is extremely funny - same with Jay & Silent Bob Strike Back - but they're also incredibly derivative, to say the least. They are not the work of a man challenging himself with new subjects, characters, or interests: they are the result of a man at a creative crossroads, who ultimately retreats back to familiar, redundant material, rather than risk failure.

He did take a chance, however, and unfortunately failed miserably with the complete public trashing of Jersey Girl, a film which really isn't all that bad but is memorable simply for its mediocrity. I mention it here because this seems to me to be Smith's breaking point. He had weathered criticism, insecurity, and financial ruin, but never before had it all happened with the same film, and never to this severity. He bounced back with Clerks II, making arguably his best film despite "retiring" the Askewniverse, but even with that success you could tell he was just throwing his hands up, uncertain of what to do and apparently employing a kind of shotgun approach to his career. He followed that quickly with Zack and Miri Make a Porno, a cry for attention that audiences mostly ignored... After that came Cop Out, an absolute disaster commercially and critically. Smith proponents argue that the film would have been better had he written it himself, but they are clearly grasping at straws: whatever script Cop Out had was obviously ignored in favor of improvisation, and it seems like Smith had either no control over the actors, or he didn't really care about the final product.


Smith's most recent title, Red State, is supposedly his final film - but, then, he has made such claims before. This fascinates me. According to interviews and his own web site, Smith is taking himself out of filmmaking - ostensibly because there is no future in the film world, and he would like to devote himself solely to web-based media. If this is sincere, more luck to him, but this to me sounds more like a man giving up, not taking a stand.

I think the failures and the vitriol got to be too much for him. When he was younger, Smith used to tour with his movies and do his famous Q&As for free - just because he had so much fun doing it... then he started to charge for it... then he started to charge more... and then he started to become hostile. Smith makes it no secret that his humor was developed as a defense mechanism for his obesity, but over the last few years he's started to get kind of nasty and impatient with people, even his fans. He would say things in a kind of frank (even somewhat rude) way, but there was always a winking assurance that no matter what was said, it was all in good fun... lately, he's lost the wink, and sometimes it seems as though his goal is simply to shock, or (worse) to hurt.

All of this frustration and anger culminated in Red State - itself a very angry and spiteful film - and then compounded when critics and audiences again ignored and/or decried it. Smith's original intention for Red State was that he would finance the entire theatrical run independently, eventually selling rights to the highest bidder in a highly publicized auction... but when the bidding price wasn't as high as he'd hoped, and the film hadn't generated the type of interest he'd planned for, suddenly the auction was withdrawn, he kept the film to himself, and he seemed to give the metaphorical finger to anyone and everyone who questioned him.

Within just a few years, Kevin Smith has gone from the everyman filmmaker - living proof that you could accomplish something kind of extraordinary simply on wit and moxie - and then lost it all... Actually, worse than that - it's not like Smith gave it his all and had it taken from him, he simply gave up. This ribald raconteur had a gift, but he lost it to anger and ego.

6 comments:

  1. First I should state that I haven't watched Red State as of yet, but I am inclined to agree with you. I think he made a huge mistake when he attacked the critics for not liking Cop Out. He seems to forget that, without the critics, films like Clerks and Chasing Amy would have, most likely, passed by the wayside. I do think Cop Out might have been somewhat better if he had done the writing. I still don't think it would have been good, but better... maybe. But so what? No one bats 1000. Well, except Alfonso Cuaron. He is 6 for 6.

    He is starting to seem like a bitter, middle-aged man. I saw him speak a few years ago. He was quite funny, but I don't wonder if he feels a bit like a turncoat. He talked about, when he was younger, never directing something that he didn't write, and now he was ok with that prospect. It could be one of those situations where he secretly hates his own success.

    I can't say I have given up on him, or any filmmaker for that matter, but I don't look forward to his new releases like I did as a freshman in collage. Then again, that might say more about me then it does Kevin Smith.

    ReplyDelete
  2. When you stack up good v. bad films in his oeuvre, he still has a good average, but his whole attitude toward filmmaking seems to have changed. Seems like he started to become more popular as a speaker than a filmmaker; not sure what effect that had mentally.

    "Bitter" is an apt description. I don't know that he hates his success. If he has any kind of business sense, which I think he does, he'll be well off for the rest of his life. I think he's simply more thin-skinned than he'd like to admit and is too juvenile to let things go. At the beginning of EVENING HARDER, it's funny when he trots out that local article regarding JERSEY GIRL - but also very telling. It wouldn't surprise me if he routinely collects reviews (good and bad) of his films; but now that the bad has outweighed the good the last few times out, he just seems resentful.

    It's true, our own sensibilities have changed, but Smith doesn't seem to have adjusted his films, his style, or even his interests. He hasn't grown. His films look better photographically, but other than working with different actors and being more amenable to improvisation, not much else is different. What I'm noticing with these "Gave Up" entries is that they've pretty much all been directors who came to prominence based on being unique/edgy, and yet have pretty much been trotting out the same dog and pony each time.

    Speaking of Alfonso Cuaron, you have no idea how much I look forward to GRAVITY... Actually, I'm sure you do. I'm always intrigued by Cuaron, what really excites me is he and Lubezki pairing up again. The man just puts out nothing but photographic masterpieces.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Lubezki has shot all of his films with the exception of Azkaban (he was busy during that one, although that film looks decent anyway). My wife and I are reading the harry Potter books with our oldest daughter and watching the films after each book. I am excited for finishing the third book as I haven't watched that film since I did my senior thesis on it. I better not see Alfonso Cuaron on your list of filmmakers you gave up on, or I will be writing about bloggers I gave up on shortly afterwords.

    I am surprised at how excited I am for Prometheus. You have any thoughts on that one?

    ReplyDelete
  4. AZKABAN looks amazing, in my opinion - the best of the series photographically and content-wise. Lubezki has turned in incredible work with Malick, but in my mind I'll always pair him with Cuaron; some directors and cinematographers just work perfectly together. I can't believe CHILDREN OF MEN was 2006 - it's been too long! Trust me, I don't think Cuaron will disappoint any time soon. He challenges himself.

    I was actually thinking the same thing just a couple days ago (whenever it was I saw the most recent trailer). If you had told me that an ALIEN prequel actually looked exciting, interesting, and anything other than a cash whore to further bilk the series, I never would have believed you... yet here I am, a believer.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Whatever you may think of his films (I am hit or miss), Ridley Scott is, at least, a "real" filmmaker. He wouldn't do it if he didn't want to. At least I know it wont be a cheap commercial product. I looks like it lays a backdrop for the Alien series more then a straight up prequel. Did you see the Guy Pierce/Peter Wayland promo? If you didn't, it is linked on my facebook page. That is what really did me in.

    And yes, Azkaban looked amazing. I was being funny when I said it looked decent.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I've generally been a fan, though I also find Scott overrated. GLADIATOR, for instance, I thought was decent, not anything special. I pretty much hate BLADE RUNNER, despite loving the book it's based on. And I was a really big fan of MATCHSTICK MEN, which kind of went by the wayside unfortunately. Oh well. He is certainly a great craftsman. My concern that he was taking this strictly as a "paycheck" kind of job has been alleviated. Excited to see where it goes.

    Sorry, it's hard to pick up on things like that online. I knew you were a huge fan - it just threw me off!

    ReplyDelete